Sunday, March 1, 2009

Review of Reading 16: Ill Winds: The Chemical Plant Next Door


A review of Ill Winds: The Chemical Plant Next Door by Becky Bradway.
Published in E: The Environmental Magazine, September/October 2002


Summary

This article talks about one woman’s personal experience with the unfair environmental conditions many rural towns are subjected to. Bradway spent part of her childhood living in Buffalo, Illinois, one of the small towns near Borden Chemical and Plastics. She discusses the negative effects that those chemical emissions had on the health of the workers and the surrounding environment. Eventually, the author’s mother and uncle died of cancer, and Bradway battled cancer herself.

Borden, Inc. built a PVC plant in 1962, and in 1987 it came under new ownership as Borden Chemicals and Plastics Limited Partnership. Later on, the company went bankrupt and was purchased by Formosa Plastics Corporation in 2002.

This article is divided into three parts and discusses the effects of lax regulations on rural plants and factories in our nation.


Borden and Buffalo

While reading the article, I was faced with many questions. For example, why was this factory allowed to stay despite its emission of many harmful chemicals? What it boils down to is that rural people have no power. Why didn’t the citizens just move to find other jobs? This is easier said than done, and needs to be looked at from the perspective of such communities: people are born, raised, and die there. A lack of opportunity combined with lifestyle choices keeps them from leaving, and so companies such as Borden Chemical are necessary to provide jobs.

Relics Remain

The main products of Borden were resins, formaldehyde, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). These chemicals cause high rates of liver and breast cancer amongst workers and make their way into the surrounding environment. A particularly disturbing fact is that multiple companies and farms are polluting the nearby Sangamon River, wells, and landfills. These companies obtain waivers and exemptions that allow them to disregard environmental protection laws. The result? Here are some shocking facts:

  • Borden once shipped 2,500 drums of highly toxic mercury waste to South African which then leaked contaminants.
  • Borden can legally dump 800,000 gallons of wastewater into a local stream (in an area where people hunt and fish) EVERY DAY.
  • Borden releases a combined 105,000 pounds of vinyl chloride and vinyl acetate into the air every year.

Blue-Collar Risks


A simple solution would be for employees to just refuse to do these hazardous jobs, right? Wrong. Many of these people are forced to risk their health at the expense of losing their jobs. The author mentions how in one factory, workers were told to clean “mystery chemicals” out of tanks. Those who obeyed all contracted a rare cancer, and those who refused lost their jobs. Other available jobs, such as construction, came with risks of their own so there really was no escape for many citizens. Despite the choices individuals made to keep their families safe, many health risks were unfortunately both unbeknown to them and beyond their control.


New Terms

industrial chemicals: chemicals developed or manufactured for use in industrial operations or research by industry, government, or academia

coal tar: a tar formed from distillation of bituminous coal

vinyl chloride: a substance used in manufacturing plastics; known to be toxic and carcinogenic (cancer-causing); breathing high levels of vinyl chloride for short periods of time can cause dizziness, sleepiness, unconsciousness and, at extremely high levels, death, while breathing vinyl chloride for long periods of time can result in permanent liver damage, nerve damage, liver cancer, brain tumors, lung cancer, and malignancies of the digestive tract

resin: any of a large class of synthetic products that have some of the physical properties of natural resins but are chemically different and are used chiefly in plastics

formaldehyde: a pungent, colorless, toxic, water-soluble gas that is used as a disinfectant and preservative; also used in the manufacture of synthetic resins, dyes, and plastics

polyvinyl chloride (PVC): a common thermoplastic resin, used in a wide variety of manufactured products, including rainwear, garden hoses, phonograph records, and floor tiles

ethylene dichloride: a colorless, toxic, and extremely flammable liquid with a mild odor that produces poisonous gases when it burns; usually converted to vinyl-chloride monomer for PVC production

vinyl-chloride monomer: an extremely flammable gas with a faint odor; a known human carcinogen with dangerous toxic effects when absorbed by the skin or inhaled; also causes severe irritation of the eyes; used to produce PVC

hydrogen chloride: a colorless or slightly yellow gas with an irritating, pungent odor; also known as hydrochloric acid; irritating and corrosive to the eyes, skin, and mucous membranes; exposure to high concentrations can cause laryngitis, bronchitis, and pulmonary edema, and brief exposures to concentrations in the range of 1,300 to 2,000 ppm are lethal to humans

ammonia: a colorless gas with a very sharp odor; is irritating to the skin, eyes, nose, throat, and lungs; exposure to high concentrations in the air can severely burn the skin, eyes, throat, or lungs and in extreme cases blindness, lung damage, or death can occur

vinyl acetate: a clear, colorless liquid with a sweet, fruity smell that is very flammable; used to make other industrial chemicals


Concepts that Challenged My Thinking

While reading this article, I was absolutely appalled that this is allowed to happen in our country! Putting these harmful chemical plants in rural, low-income areas in our country is definitely an example of the “NIMBY” (not in my backyard!) mindset. I can’t believe that all those chemicals are allowed to be released into rivers, landfills, and the air. Dumping 800,000 gallons of wastewater into a local stream everyday? Do these businessmen have absolutely no conscience? I also found it infuriating that Borden was exempt from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations. I didn’t even know that was possible! Also, I could hardly stand to read about those poor employees who were given the ultimatum of performing hazardous tasks or losing their job. This is definitely not legal. I thought our nation had moved past such happenings, but I guess I was horribly mistaken.


Additional Resources

In addition to all the harm Borden Chemical inflicted upon its surrounding environment with its appalling emissions of chemical pollutants, they were a company that manufactured PVC – an extremely hazardous product itself. Check out this article by the Center for Health, Environment & Justice for more information!


19 comments:

  1. Hey Hannah,
    Wow you had a very interesting reading this week. I cannot believe how these harmful chemicals are being distributed among rivers, landfills, and the air. This is certainly a problem that has not been dealt with. Something needs to change. Dumping 800,000 gallons of waste water into a local stream everyday is dangerous to not only people, but wildlife as well. Great job Hannah!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hannah,
    I really liked this reading this week, as well. It was very eye opening for me. You did a great job summarizing the article! I also can't believe that all those chemicals are allowed to be released into our fresh water! I can't believe that it's legal to be dumping 800,000 gallons of waste water into a local stream everyday! I would have to assume that the factory pollution is definitely correlated with the cancer of the towns people. I would move far far away if I had the opportunity. At least far enough so that there wasn't a factory in my backyard! =)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hannah,
    You are right about small towns revolving around factory life. I think you would agree with me that Kraft and 3M are the two of the largest employers in New Ulm. I don't want to make assumptions, but I can't help but think of unsafe environmental practices these corporations might be involved in...the Minnesota River and Cottonwood River are known to be heavily polluted with various chemicals, which makes me question the major sources of those chemicals. Good links and great post!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Hannah!

    I thought you did a really good job with this review! It was really easy to follow and very informational. I can't believe our country would allow such nonsense as well! The whole concept of NIMBY is just ridiculous, and it's just so sad that some people have to live in such harsh conditions because of the selfishness of others!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Hannah,
    I like to hear your thoughts and opinions in class, and although some of us said we didn't like the reading, you really had a valid thought when you said that she kind of left us thinking, instead of saying that the company WAS the reason for cancer!
    Good question though, why was Borden allowed to stay? I think people from rural areas still have a voice too! It seems like a lot of things in life are easier said than done, and for this case, I think that is the reason! I know that it takes a very unique person to rise up and say something or make a change! How does a company get exmept from the EPA? That's interesting!
    Great review Hannah!

    Kathy

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hannah,
    I couldn't believe that they were allowed to be dumping the wastes into our rivers either! It was really shocking to see the amounts they were allowed to dump as well. I feel really bad for the people who were given the do it or lose your job ultimatum as well! It's ridiculous and immoral to have people chose between their job and what could be the end of their life!

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's awful that people are dumping so many toxins into other peoples drinking water and that doctors won't "fess" up to what is causing peoples illnesses in their towns!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hannah-

    Great post. You had a lot of great links to different terms, which was very helpful! It's sad to think that we are still at a stand still when it comes to the idea having threatening someone to do something harmful of lose their job. Yet again, the "man" only caring about himself and not everyone else around.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hannah,
    Good summary, I agree it's amazing that our government EPA will give exemptions to anyone when they know this kind of activity is so harmful to the environment and the people living in it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hannah
    First of all your picture is really good! Puts a nice perspective on the topic! This reading kind of hit me more than the rest, because it seems like something that could effect more people and cancer is such a terrible thing. I can't believe corporations can do this to our environment, and not even care. Great review!

    heather

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great job on your review Hannah. You did a really good job of defining some of the complicated concepts and terms, and it helped to furthur understand all the article was about. I too feel this whole situation is hard to swallow...its kinda the way I feel with each article and documentary. Although I appreciate learning it and becoming more aware, it is difficult to know this is happening all around us, everyday.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It is very sad to know what is allowed in this country. I had no idea things like this happened. All these innocent have to suffer because the industries are so inconsiderate. I am absolutely heart broken by th number of diseases caused by air polution, that can be prevented. I was also struk by the fact 800,000 gallons of wastewater are dumped into local streams everyday! Wow! Thats crazy!

    Good job!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hannah-
    After reading you section on the part where you addressed the concepts that challenged your thinking, I found myself sensing the anger that you have towards the issue. I would have to say that I was equally upset when reading about the employees having to decide between keeping their job, or being healthy. If that makes sense...
    I think we are all painfully wrong in our thinking previous to this class....the government wouldn't let that happen. Sadly they do, and sadly, our nation has not moved past such ridiculousness and disparities. I would like to answer your question, "do those businessmen have a conscious?": NO..I would have to say they dont.
    --S

    ReplyDelete
  14. Great Review! It's so disturbing to read about how these small town rural people don't have any voice on their own behalf and how they are forced to work in jobs that are harmful to their health. I still don't understand how these companies are getting away with doing this to the environment? 800,000 pounds of toxins being dumped into the river? It shows that even with regulations you still don't know who's dumping what into the rivers and streams.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nice review Hannah! It is not a good thing to hear about all these small towns being taking over by nearby plants whether they be energy or chemical. They usually only bring negative results. I don't see why there isn't anything done to have these plants be constructed farther away from towns. Hopefully there will be something set up to diminish the negative results occurring form plants being build near a populous town.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Wow...great post! I really like your writing style. Your summaries of each section weren't just facts straight from the book; instead you added a lot of your reaction and opinion into each section. I really liked it! I also was blown away by the fact that people were given the choice to clean myseterious chemicals and most likely get cancer, or refuse to clean up the chemicals and get fired. That is so wrong and upsetting!!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hannah~ Great post I really like on how you had all the terms linked up! I also liked on how you had everything set up as well! I also liked your summaries just in general it was very reader friendly!! Awesome work keep it up girl!!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Honestly Hannah,

    You said it why is this company allowed to stay in this place and continue to be run with emitting such harmful toxins into the city.... its frustrating! The EPA I agree with you that is just as equally infuriating! I don't know what we could do to make a difference? Its a tough question! Great job your post was very well done and in depth!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hannah,

    How could they (Borden Chem) get an exemption from the EPA? This is so shocking to hear. Do they have some sort of less deadly chemical they are dumping that gives them the exemption? That is the only way I could see the EPA allowing this expemtion. It is too bad that people fish and hunt on and near the river of which gets 2,500 drums of toxic waste. That is disgusting. I would never want to fish in that river. Your right I thought America is at a higher level of social development, and would never allow such crulety. Both the employees being forced to clean up unknown deadly chemicals, and the inconsideration of dumping toxic waste.

    ReplyDelete