Thursday, March 5, 2009

Review of Documentary: Green



The documentary Green was directed, produced, and edited by Laura Dunn in 2000.
Click HERE for additional information about the filming of this documentary.


Summary

This eye-opening film takes a look at the issues of environmental racism and environmental injustice, particularly focusing on Cancer Alley in Louisiana.

In the 1930s, the state of Louisiana offered tax exemptions for chemical plants that started up business there. This led to many chemical makers and refineries along the Mississippi River, stretching from Baton Rouge to New Orleans – an area now known as Cancer Alley. Presently, the concentration of chemical plants is astonishingly high, with around 150 petrochemical plants in the 100-mile stretch of land. These huge, wealthy companies give nothing to the surrounding poor communities (except for noise and chemical pollution). These companies are all self-regulated, of course, which leaves me with little hope that they are planning on changing their ways anytime soon. As if this isn’t bad enough, more plants are still being allowed to start up in this area. For example, the Japanese corporation SHINTECH was trying to build a PVC plant in Convent, Louisiana.

I found this documentary to be very effective because it was brought down to a personal level through interviews of the citizens that have to deal with this mess everyday. Their stories were heart-wrenching, and described the awful effects of their contaminated environment: children with high rates of asthma and nosebleeds, and especially all the cases of rare forms of cancer. The Mississippi River is highly polluted, and fish and shrimp can no longer be eaten from it. In some areas, the soil is so toxic that people have been forced to give up their personal gardens. Everything is contaminated by chemicals: the water, the air, the ground. It seems as if the dangers are inescapable for residents; in fact, minorities in this area experience disproportionate amounts of cancer.

Dunn did a great job of portraying environmental injustice through the stories of the citizens, but also through her cinematography. Certain shots such as the train with car after car bearing a chemical warning really drove home the extent of this problem. Also, the series of company logos that have plants in the area seemed to go on forever. At another point, charts were shown that depicted the high rates of air pollution concentration in Louisiana as opposed to other parts of the country.


New Terms

benzene: a sweet smelling, highly toxic hydrocarbon; long-term exposure to benzene is known to cause anemia and leukemia

Cancer Alley: an area along the Mississippi River between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, in the River Parishes of Louisiana, which contains numerous industrial plants

developmental toxin: substance that causes malformations of an embryo or fetus

environmental injustice: inequitable environmental burdens borne by groups such as racial minorities, women, residents of economically disadvantaged areas, or residents of developing nations

environmental justice: the movement to reverse environmental racism

environmental racism: intentional or unintentional racial discrimination in the enforcement of environmental rules and regulations, the intentional or unintentional targeting of minority communities for the placement of polluting industries, or the exclusion of minority groups from public and private boards, commissions, and regulatory bodies

neuroblastoma: a leading childhood form of cancer that arises in the adrenal gland or in tissue in the nervous system that is related to the adrenal gland

reproductive toxin: chemicals that can damage the reproductive systems of both men and women. Exposure to these agents before conception can produce a wide range of adverse effects including reduced fertility, an abnormal fetus, reduced libido, or menstrual dysfunction. Maternal exposure after conception may cause prenatal death, low birth weight, birth defects, developmental and/or behavioral disabilities, and cancer.

rhabdomyosarcoma: a malignant tumor composed of striated muscle fibers


Concepts that Challenged My Thinking

First of all, I can’t believe houses were allowed to be built on top of toxic landfills. Now that the repercussions of this poor planning are being realized, the top two feet of the ground are being cleared off. This is in no way going to fix the problem. Making matters worse, the people who live in this area were not even given the courtesy of being relocated. Construction was going on right outside their doorstep! Why is the EPA not being an ally for these people? Isn’t that their purpose, to be a protection agency? Also, the thought that these people are considered “expendable” just makes me so angry. Consider the definition of expendable: not worth preserving, able to be sacrificed to achieve an objective, capable of being replaced. In my opinion, labeling any human being in this manner is quite unethical.

I was really shocked by the way the reports of cancers in southern Louisiana are conducted. Apparently, the reports are divided into regions, causing the data to be spread out and therefore skewed. The concentration of cancer cases appears diluted compared to how it would look if it was accurately portrayed parish by parish. Also, it appears that the Louisiana Chemical Association funds this tumor registry. Really? I’m willing to bet that factors into the way the data is portrayed, don’t you think?

Another thing that really bothered me was how casually the people from these chemical companies treat the subject. The representative who was talking about how she respected the environment and planted a garden to attract birds and insects seemed unaware of the dire circumstances of residents living in the actual neighborhoods surrounding the plants. Also, the subject of the explosion in Norco was just glossed over by saying that at least the town got refurbished! Considering eight employees died in this explosion, I don’t know if a little cosmetic work for the town really evens things out.

Also, I realized I’m not doing anything to reverse this problem. In fact, I’m even contributing to it every day! I never stopped to think how practically EVERYTHING we use these days is touched by the chemical industry: soap, lipstick, contact lenses, glasses, pipes, shingles, and tires – the list is endless. It’s upsetting to think that by making a cheap purchase of a product in a store, I am taking advantage of other people who have to deal with the direct effects of these chemical companies.


Additional Resources

Many of us were shocked at the part of the documentary that talked about the people living on the landfill. For more information about the Agriculture Street Landfill, visit these two sites:
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/agriculturestreet/asl_p1.html#sum

http://www.umich.edu/~snre492/Jones/agstreet.htm#PROBLEM

Did SHINTECH succeed in getting a plant in Louisiana? Click HERE to find out.

For further information on the Shell explosion in Norco and the harm this company has caused to surrounding communities, check out this book excerpt.

(Photo taken by David Farmer at stock.xchng.)

23 comments:

  1. Hannah-
    You did an amazing job summarizing the video "Green." I cannot believe that houses are built on landfills either. How didn't these corporations realize what they were doing? It' was heart breaking to see the suffering children deal with asthma and other diseases leading to cancer. I thought this video was very eye opening for all of us. Great job Hannah!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great great job Hannah. This post is really thorough, and very thought provoking. I was also very shocked to hear how the EPA was treating the communities they were harming. Its just so hard to believe that people actually tell themselves these types of actions are ok, that they are ok with the way they are living their lives and making a living for their families. I garentee if their children were faced with the issues these families have endured, they would have a change of heart. Not to wish that upon anyone in any way, but what would they think if that were the case?? I would bet things would be different... Very good job Hannah :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's true, the list is endless of how we're supporting the companies that provide absolutely nothing but dirty air and diseases to the population around the plants... It's no where near fair for people to just blow off the issue and act as if what they're doing as a profession isn't affecting the people around them. I had never thought before how the paper mill in my town might affect my breathing, or how much working in a coal plant would affect my dads health... It's interesting to think about now

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hannah

    I really liked your concepts that challenged your thinking. You are right in saying that we're contributing way to much. It seems so harmless too! Thank you for all of your wonderful definitions, I needed them all a lot! I'm really glad that we got to watch this documentary because it really bothered me! Great job!

    Heather

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hannah!
    This was a great post about "Green"!
    I also liked how it was very personal and made it feel emotional were the personal testimonies! It was interesting to hear the stories and see the faces of these people who were effected and how sad some people were to give up gardening, lose loved ones, and have loved ones risk their health...I was so amazed to see the company logos of the companies that were in the Cancer Alley area!!! I recognized most of them and I feel guilty for even being a consumer of those companies! I had no idea! Ugh, it is really frustrating to hear how casually these companies are making this problem sound. It's almost like they are trying to use reverse psychology! This film also made me realize I am not doing anything to reverse this problem, except we are contributing and supporting these companies! HOw frustrating, what can we do???
    Thanks Hannah!

    Kathy

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good post hannah!
    I also agree that the personal testimonies were a good add to the film! I cant believe how many companies participate in harming our environment! It is hard to not question every company and product that is out there right now. Great terms and concepts that challenged your thinking!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great post hannah,
    I agree with you I havent really stopped to think how nearly everything we use is touched by chemical industries. I also thought it was really sad that the stretch of the river was called cancer alley. If the companies and industries knew how dangerous the chemical plants were you think that they would want to change and reverse that.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hannah-

    I really enjoyed this documentary as well! I feel like it touched on everything that needed to be touched on. Most importantly, got input from the people who were being affected the most. It bothered me too, how casually the people from the plants treat the subject. Make me think if they have ever spoken with people who are affect, or if they just don't care, as long as they get their green?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hannah,
    I absolutely agree with you it is unbelievable that peoples homes were built on toxic landfills....really what is this world coming to. the stories are very heart wrenching you are exactly right. In addition I agree with the way you said that this video has a great impact because it address real people in real life situations. I never really thought about how we just buying whatever we may without thought backing our purchases really is having a direct affect on the individuals that have to dwell in the presence of the companies manufacturing them... YIKES:S!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wow Hannah, you did a really great job on your post. You were so thorough. I especially liked reading your personal thought section. You were so passionate about what you talked about. I agree that it is totally wrong that peoples' houses were built ontop of a landfill, and now only the top two feet of the ground are being cleared off. This construction is being done right in front of people's houses. The government won't ever relocate these poor people. How rotten!!! I also thought that it was horrible how certain cancer reports were conducted. The people conducting the reports were able to make it look like there weren't any trends, due to their sample population, when in reality there is TOTALLY a trend. This makes me really upset! Great job focussing on these points.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hannah,
    Good review! I like how you pointed out E.PROTECTION A. they are there to protect the citizens of this great country. They have to do a better job. Money goes a long way in the world we're living in and if you have lots of it you can get away with a lot of shady stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hannah,
    Good review! I like how you pointed out E.PROTECTION A. they are there to protect the citizens of this great country. They have to do a better job. Money goes a long way in the world we're living in and if you have lots of it you can get away with a lot of shady stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hannah,

    I also can't believe they built houses on top of a landfill! That's ridiculous, and gross. I felt really bad for the people that lived near cancer alley. Especially all the kids that develop chronic diseases such as asthma and cancer. It's so unfair...

    ReplyDelete
  14. Nice post Hannah,
    I agree with you, Dunn a really good job with this video desmonstrating how people are affected by this environmental crisis. I was really shocked by the cancer cases as well, I never knew things like this really happenned. I hope the EPA is going to do a better job helping people in environmental crisis such as "cancer alley".

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hannah,
    I would be so mad if I found out my house was built on top of a landfill!!! I can't believe that actually happened...Also, if it wasn't for this class I would have never known about this situation. I wish more people could be aware of it so they could do their part to help reduce the number of plants in Louisiana. Overall, great post! Keep up the good work=)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hannah,
    I think you did a really great summary of the film. I think it's so sad that these people are almost stuck in this cancer bubble and can do nothing about it! I hope someone steps up soon to help these people.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hannah-
    I was really really influenced by your writing when you stated that certain populations are expendable, and then defined the word. As I read the definition, I thought of it in terms of humans. Sick.
    I was also curious about the 2 feet of landfill being removed because of "environmental concerns". What if a whole new problem arises from removing this layer--what if decomposition at a bacterial level is being done and the removal of SO MUCH soil raises new diseases for the people living there?
    Another problem with the removal of the soil that isn't so environmentally related is the psychological effects the construction is having on the children. I couldn't imagine being in that noise all day everyday, and on top of them they are in a way learning that it might be "normal" or "okay" to live on top of a landfill. I think of our perception of garbage (assuming most of us didn't grow up on landfills) compared to those children's perceptions. Can't you just see them outside playing with their trucks and trying to dig to china all while running across tires, plastic bottles, chemical containers etc... ??
    --s

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hey Hannah,
    Good review! Being that the companies said that these people are expendable really angered me as well. Especially after you made clear what the definition of expendable is.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hannah~
    Great post!!! I could not believe that people were basically living in an landfill...and people actually though that it was ok and livable for people if they just took 2 feet of the land!! I would really not want to drink the water there!!! This movie was a big eye opener for me too!! Keep up the great work!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hannah-
    I can't believe that people were just living on top of a landfill and the company's solution was to clear the top 2 feet off. It is not going to fix the problem at all!! And the cancer reports were ridiculous how they reported them!! Great post!:)

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hannah,
    As always, you did a FANTASTIC job of summarizing the documentary! I really enjoyed reading the additional information about the filming of this documentary in the article, "Don't Drink the Water." I always like to know the story behind things, so thanks for providing it!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Great Post! I liked how you were extremely thorough writing this review, there is tons of info and it's easy to read. I'm also confused on why the EPA isn't helping those people in need? To me there can't be more of a clear cut problem that needs to be addressed by the EPA than what's happening to those people in LA. It's hard to think we are benefitting off of things that are actually making people suffer, and you can't just stop using plastics because they are in everything we use. I wish there was a easier way not depend plastics so much.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I think that when you can't grow your own garden, or eat seafood from the Mississippi River than you have to wonder if it is really a good idea for these chemical plants to oporate the way they are. If they affect the wildlife then that means they affect humans too. WE are just as vunerable to viruses, and diseases as wildlife. Often wildlife is the first sign of a problem when there are massive amounts of disease killing a population.

    It would be wise for the state government of Louisiana to start having a more regulated chemical plant industry. Getting your land value up and erasing poverty should be one of your highest concerns as a govenor of the state of Louisiana, since they rank so poorly in these areas.

    ReplyDelete